The Ethics of Economic Metaphors: The History of the Invisible Hand (Part 2)
How a small phrase started in faith, wandered into economics, and became a symbol far larger than Smith ever intended.
Series Note:
đ This post is Part 2: History of the Invisible Hand for my series The Ethics of Economic Metaphors.
You can read all parts here â [link coming soon]
Why Use the âInvisible Handâ as a Case Study?
For more than two centuries now, Adam Smithâs little phraseâthe âinvisible handââhas drifted through classrooms, boardrooms, and dinner-table debates. People repeat it with a kind of fond familiarity, almost as though it were an old family proverb everyone is expected to know by heart. It moves through our conversations quietly, without much reflection, like a saying whose meaning nobody has checked in years.
The philosopher John D. Bishop once asked a room full of business leaders what they believed the phrase meant. Most of themâwell over sixty percentâsaid they thought the market could quietly correct itself, guided by some unseen force. They spoke of it the way one might speak of gravityâever-present, steady, and trustworthy.
Today, the phrase is still offered as a gentle reassurance: that if each of us simply follows our own interests, the wider world will settle into harmony, much like water finding its level.
Over time, it has become a comforting shorthandâa symbolic way of suggesting that self-interest alone is enough to support the common good.
This small phrase has gathered many reactions along the wayâsometimes admired, sometimes questioned. Even John Maynard Keynes observed how deeply it shaped the economic thinking of an entire century. And so, the âinvisible handâ continues its quiet journey through our language, part history and part metaphor, appearing whenever we talk about how people and markets find their way through the world.
⢠Milton Friedman
In Why Government Is the Problem, Friedman opens by recalling:
âYou remember Adam Smithâs famous law of the invisible hand: People who intend only to seek their own benefit are âled by an invisible hand to serve a public interest which was no part of their intention.ââ
â Hoover Institution
⢠George Washington
In his First Inaugural Address, Washington invoked the idea in a more poetic form:
âNo People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of menâŚâ
â George Washingtonâs Mount Vernon
⢠Mitt Romney (U.S. Presidential Candidate)
During the 2012 campaign, Romney referenced the metaphor directly:
âI actually believe in the invisible hand! I think itâs the basis of capitalism.â
â Quartz
⢠Conservative / Reagan-Era Rhetoric
The âinvisible handâ became a staple in conservative and free-market speeches. Commentators often note that Reaganâs economic vision rested on faith that the marketâs unseen hand would guide private effort toward public good.
â Quartz
⢠Pierre Trudeau (Canada)
Trudeau pushed back against blind faith in market forces:
âAs against the âinvisible handâ of Adam Smith, there has to be a visible hand of politicians whose objective is to have the kind of society that is caring and humane.â
â A-Z Quotes
A neat turn of phraseâacknowledging the mythic power of the market but insisting government must still play a guiding role.
⢠Boris Johnson (U.K.)
In a speech on the Internal Market Bill, Johnson invoked the metaphor in a lively, almost poetic way:
ââŚand allowed the invisible hand of the market to move Cornish pasties to Scotland, Scottish Beef to Wales, Welsh beef to EnglandâŚâ
â Gov.uk
He used it to argue for freer trade and economic integration across the U.K., especially after Brexit.
⢠Joseph Stiglitz (Economist and Public Figure)
A sharp critic of the metaphorâs overuse:
âThe reason that the invisible hand often seems invisible is that it is often not there.â
â Wikiquote
⢠John Maynard Keynes
A notoriously skeptical figure toward laissez-faire, Keynes once admitted:
âI find myself more and more relying for a solution of our problems on the invisible hand which I tried to eject from economic thinking twenty years ago.â
â MaynardKeynes.org
Key Points
Over time, Smithâs phrase âthe invisible handâ has evolved into a cultural shorthandâwidely repeated, broadly trusted, and often assumed to describe a natural self-correcting force in markets.
Political leaders, economists, and public figures across eras have invoked the metaphor to support competing narratives: some treat it as evidence of market harmony, others as a myth that obscures the need for institutional guidance.
The phraseâs endurance reflects its symbolic power, not its precision; it has become a flexible signifier that people project their beliefs onto, allowing it to justify a wide range of economic and political claims.
Before the Myth â The Real Story of the âInvisible Handâ
A Metaphor Born of Faith, Not Finance
Very few people pause to wonder where the phrase truly began. Over the years, Adam Smith has received much of the creditâand sometimes the blameâbut the story of the âinvisible handâ reaches further back than most realize. And here is the quiet, pleasant surprise: the phrase did not begin with Smith at all. Long before he used it, the image had already passed through the hands of poets, preachers, and philosophers, each giving it their own shade of meaning as it made its gentle way through history
One of its earliest appearances comes from William Shakespeareâs Macbeth, where the doomed king calls on the night to hide his murderous intent:
Come, seeling night,
Scarf up the tender eye of pitiful day;
And with thy bloody and invisible hand
Cancel and tear to pieces that great bond
Which keeps me pale!
But the roots go back even furtherâover 2000 yearsâto an age when people saw every twist of fate as part of something divine. Long before Wall Street or modern economics, the âinvisible handâ was a way to describe the quiet, unseen ways God was believed to shape the worldânudging events, turning hearts, and stitching chaos into order.
Thinkers and theologians across centuries used it to describe this mysterious guidance:
¡ Saint Augustine (354â430) wrote that âGodâs hand is his power, which moves visible things by invisible means.â
¡ Nicolas Lenglet du Fresnoy (1735) spoke of an âinvisible handâ that alone governs âwhat happens under our eyes.â
¡ Even in Genesis 41, the story of Joseph rising from prisoner to ruler of Egypt was seen as the work of that same unseen handâmisfortune transformed into destiny.
For centuries, the phrase belonged to the realm of faith, fate, and moral reflectionâa way of describing how divine purpose could move through ordinary lives, even when people had no intention of serving it. It had nothing to do with markets or money; it was about mystery and meaning.
Adam Smith, ever the thoughtful moral philosopher, knew the roots of the phrase well. Many of those old books that first spoke of the âinvisible handâ rested on his own shelves. So when he used it, his readers didnât hear something newâthey heard something familiar, something with soul.
They understood it as an old metaphor reborn: a gentle way of speaking about the unseen threads that guide our worldâwhether through Providence, through chance, or through the quiet harmony of human lives intertwined.
Key Points
The phrase âinvisible handâ predates Adam Smith by centuries; it originated in religious and literary contexts, where it described divine or unseen moral guidance rather than market behavior.
Thinkers from Augustine to early modern theologians used the metaphor to capture the idea of hidden forces shaping events, and Smithâs contemporaries would have recognized it in this older, spiritual lineage.
Smithâs adoption of the phrase was therefore not an economic invention but a philosophical borrowing; its original function was moral and providential, not financial.
Footer Navigation:
đ Next in the series: Part 3 âUnderstanding What Smith Meant â [link coming soon]
đ Back to Part 1 â The Limits of Reason: Why Our Minds Reach for Metaphors â [link coming soon]
đż Series Navigation
Read all parts: [link to tag page]
Start from Part 1: [link coming soon]
Next post: [link coming soon]
Previous post: [link coming soon]


